China is Not 5,000 Years Old
Chinese culture is NOT 5,000 years old, it's 50 years old, which is why they are only learning now not to poopie on the street.
And Chinese do not understand the difference between the words civilization and culture.
Civilization means you live in a box, you don't go around roaming
killing animals, raping wimmin and stealing stuff, changing your name
changing your location all the time i.e., being a jew, a mongol, a
Shanxi ren or whatever, but you live in a box. Wow. You might even have a
but culture is actually deciding to USE that toilet
and China hasn't done that even so much YET.
Japan is the oldest culture in SE Asia by far, and this is because they
don't have revolutions, they don't bulldoze the whole society and
history every few years. It's not part of their way of being, to build
new things, screw them up, blow them up, then make more new things. The
chinese do this even in restaurants. Order a table full of food. Wreck
the whole area with spit out food, liquor, smoke, barf, spit, whatever.
Then a team of farmer girls descend upon the area after they leave,
"cleaning" it up. Constantly blowing things up, making it new etc.
I found out about this problem from a professor here who says
Confucianism was dead way back in the 300's BC. Revolution, upheaval,
war, build anew, wreck it...maintenence just isn't in the Chinese
vocabulary. So after you wreck it, burn all the books, then build anew,
there's always a class of intellectuals who pretend they have a copy of
the book or pretend they knew what was there and that they'll remake old
culture. The problem is, you can't remake it anymore than you can
replant a dead tree (this is an idiom in the book " The Journey West").
This professor says that not only is Confucianism purely fictional in
today's China, it's the fiction of a fiction of a fiction of a fiction,
roughly four or five times over.
I discovered this problem when studying The Dream of Red Mansions. A
book from a couple hundred years ago. I bought a copy and studied every
new character. Apparently they had much more advanced Chinese then. A
huge vocabulary, tons of stuff to learn. Yet because I'm this foreigner
and taking everything so seriously and looking into all these details, I
find huge discrepancies between different versions of the book. I start
asking around, what is the actual version of the book? I mean, the book
that the author wrote, character for character? And the answer is, even
for a book that's not all that ancient (it's from the Qing dynasty, no
more than 300 years ago for sure, under the emporer Kang Xi), that there
is no definitive version of the book. Even Mousy Dung banned it, burned
every copy they could find, and yet again different versions appear,
more hucksters come out saying they have a dusty copy somewhere that's
the real one etc. etc.
i.e., even a modern book, they have no original copy of it. And I'm
sorry but that's not history. There is no 5,000 year history if you
don't have the documentation to back that up. You can't prove it by
"carbon dating" either. CD is invalid and everyone knows it.
Another seriously suspicious thing is "Daoism". WIT is it? No one can
define it, just like feminism or something. They can't really say who
Laozi was or what he wrote. The idea that Daode Jing was written by him
is purely a local myth - no foreigner believes it. You read the book and
obviously it is of several different styles over history all mashed
together. Looks like bureaucratic BM from several different eras which
has been again revised by the current dynasty. Sort of like Jack
Handey's "Deep Thoughts" collected over 2,000 years and revised by the
current PC commission. Totally lame stuff.
Oh yes and simplified characters. This has happened over and over
throughout "Chinese history". some emperor comes around and doesn't want
anyone to be reading any history that may be left out there, so he
changes a significant number of the characters to screw everything up.
And instead of it becoming a new standard, all the characters just have
to be added to the lexicon (which is what is happening to simplified
characters as we speak).
And how about Zhongguo? Funny they translate that as Middle Kingdom.
Kingdom is an old word, but Zhongguo is NOT. Zhongguo is a name made up
in the 1920's. I'm not kidding. There never was a real China. They say
Qinshi Emperor unified "China" around 400 BC. (Uh, 5,000 years history?
how does all this jive). You read about it and find out that in fact he
was just some crazy warlord who took over several states and claimed he
was king of the states for a whole 12 years. Twelve years. Wow. So there
was something people are claiming was China starting back in 400 BC
which is uh 2400 years ago, not 5000 years ago and it lasted for a whole
China just means Chai Nation, or tea country, and that's what ppl from
the outside made as a general term for the states that were here. The
Han race is a modern fiction, just like White people are now, that was
composed of hundreds of races and nations before they were forcibly
integrated. Chinese are so retarded now that they say that calling them
China in Chinese, i.e. Zhina, is an insult, but they all learn Engrish
and call it China in english and their most popular blog site is called
total retards, completely in the dark ages, just learning how to use
toilets, not barf and spit on the ground, sort of learning how not to
crash into each other on the street, maybe learning to say thank you
sometimes, can't bow to each other or respect other ppl quite
yet...OBVVIOUSLY this is a 50 year old country, and even compared to 200
year old America, it's way way behind.
Who We Is
How to Join
KBH original Articles:
One Continent Man's Sperm Test
Drugs vs. Prayer
Man vs. Woman
Porn Slave Epitaph
Killed by Their
Becoming a Cow
The Mythopoetic Men's Movement
New Menation Cult proposed
China vs. India
Prudes are the Real Sexperts
Teeterin on TC?
Go Hang a Salami, I'm a
Thoughts on Kids
How Faggy is Bodybuildin?
How to Keep Your Stallion in
Health of Nations
How to Talk Hick
Sex is Not Enjoyable
The End of Mankind
A Discussion Between Dr.
Rob and Uncle Jeebers
Why Intoxicants Cause
ॐ The Gospel of the Holy Twelve ॐ
7th Day Adventism
Jesus was White  
Try out the KBH lifestyle:
Or to live with KBH members contact us
Madogga: One of History's Biggest Dicks
Bill Burr 
Subverting the Disney Legacy
Dark Night of the Soul by St. John of the Cross
The value of silence
Cow Protection and its Importance to Society [pdf]
Believe in Being Chaste [LDS link]
on the Environment [7th Day Adventist link]
The Successful Politician
Does Not Drink by George Washington Plunkitt
Who Built the Moon?
against vastectomy which gives clues as to how left-hand
tantrists get sick
The crazy Talmud
What's up with Dinosaurs and Dragons? video
by Kent Hovind
the Sons of God
by Steve Quale: proofs
Crisis to Peace: How vegetarianism can save
Semen Loss as cause of disease: 1800's French
European physician article
Swami Sivananda: The Horror of Semen Loss article
Preservation of Vital Fluid: Sikh article
The Dangers of Mouth Breathing: pdf
Natural Health Videos
By Magnus Muller
Mormons against self-abuse:
Against MGM and
Porn Propaganda Debunked
Spitual Warfare: pdf